How Do You Know When the Master Cylinder Is Bad
Hollywood seems determined to profit from remakes and sequels that picture makers take no business concern writing, producing or releasing. Rather than working hard to generate new films — ones with novel plot devices, leads and stories from underrepresented communities and compelling cinematic visions, for instance — the bigwigs of the American film industry are on a mission to quickly ruin any remnant of millennial childhood nostalgia.
So, it is with a heavy center — and in recognition that January ten, 2021, marks v years since the passing of the absolutely legendary and unequalled David Bowie — that I am forced to address the announcement of a Labyrinth sequel. Now, does the original motion-picture show require, necessitate or even hint at a sequel? Is the pb thespian from the original movie prepared to make an appearance? Is the original manager all the same available? The respond to these questions is a unmarried, resounding "NO." And yet, here we are. Sigh.
Allow me to take a brief moment to talk over why a Labyrinth sequel is an awful, terrible, no-good idea.
A Bowie-Less Labyrinth Sequel Will Exist a Travesty
The upcoming Labyrinth sequel faces some tough challenges. For starters, information technology's going to be missing its eternal, androgynous Jareth the Goblin Rex — a.k.a. the incomparable David Bowie. In 2016, the iconic genre- and gender-bending rock star lost a long battle with liver cancer. His failing health was a well-kept cloak-and-dagger, and fans and admirers from all over the world mourned his untimely passing.
If you believe that Bowie's absence from a Labyrinth sequel is more a casting challenge than a reason to cancel the entire project, I'd recommend that you go back and spotter the original 1986 film. Bowie's presence extends beyond his insanely flustered hairdo, gigantic codpiece and absurd charismatic demeanor — the human being also wrote and performed more than than half of the movie'southward soundtrack.
Seeing Bowie perform every bit Jareth is much similar watching him as Ziggy Stardust. It can be challenging to split the truth from the fiction of these performances, equally Bowie becomes so engrossed in his characterization that he simply ceases to be himself. Even as an adult, it'south difficult to watch Jareth the Goblin King prance, dance and sing without occasionally stopping to call back, "Wow. That really is David Bowie. And, yep, I will 'Trip the light fantastic the Magic Dance' down my hallway."
I'm sad, but it'south impossible for a casting director to find a multitalented role player/musician to fill Bowie'south shoes in an upcoming sequel. It's too a challenge to imagine whatever viable reason why the original — seemingly immortal — Goblin Rex would accept all of a sudden changed course. This blazon of confusion only deepens when because what might become of the Labyrinth's creatures.
Jim Henson, the mastermind behind the Muppets, directed the original Labyrinth film. His masterful puppetry showed a depth of skill unmatched past rival puppeteers, and in a fourth dimension without impressive CGI graphics, he was 1 of the go-to guys for practical special furnishings. Sadly, Henson passed away in 1990. Since that time, there have been no less than five theatrical releases with his charming Muppet characters — and they've all been atrocious.
Some might take those movies every bit a sign that Henson's absence is no big deal when attempting to brand a sequel. They would be incredibly incorrect. A Labyrinth sequel without Bowie AND Jim Henson would exist like a Mrs. Doubtfire sequel without Robin Williams. (Don't yous dare, 20th Century Fox!) Just finish thinking about it and appreciate this magic for what it is!
Making a sequel to the Labyrinth film without using Henson'due south puppets would exist like George Lucas abandoning practical puppetry from his Star Wars franchise in favor of poorly-generated computer graphics. Oh…that's already happened, and the response has been less-than-stellar. Fans who have grown up watching a specific pic are bound to feel slighted, misunderstood or but plain cheated when that film ends up lost in technological translation.
Not convinced that fans don't want a CGI-heavy Labyrinth remake? Have a wait at how The Lion King fanbase (and critics) reacted to the CGI "live-action"' Disney remake. Here'south a spoiler: They didn't similar it.
A Project Fueled by Profits, Not Passions
All of this begs the question, "Why are these executives light-green-lighting and so many '80s remakes and sequels right now?" Unfortunately, the answer lies in nostalgia-based profit. Academics have long studied consumer behavior, and information technology seems that contempo studies have not fallen on deaf ears.
In 2014, the Journal of Consumer Research published findings on the connection between nostalgia and coin-spending habits. They discovered that people are more willing to spend money when they're feeling sentimental or cornball. Advert executives and picture producers have taken this tidbit of information and run with it.
That's why our current film manufacture is flooded with remakes and unasked-for sequels, especially to icons from the 1980s and 1990s. Children from that era are now full-fledged adults with existential dread well-nigh the future as climate change, pandemics and political anarchy leave generations clamoring for familiar, comforting nostalgia.
But rather than re-releasing original footage on updated media (recollect Blu-ray and 4K downloads), the film industry would rather take existing intellectual property and rebrand it for the younger generation. In most cases, the result is an alienated original audience and a disinterested youth. This is all done in the name of and for the sake of profit.
So Delight, Go out This Gem of a Flick Alone
A movie shouldn't be pre-judged every bit practiced or bad, of course, simply should instead exist judged by its merit, reception and lasting impact. However, fifty-fifty the most advanced hologram technology could not revive Bowie's onscreen presence (NOR SHOULD IT). And no corporeality of CGI could replace the authenticity and wonder of Henson'southward creations.
The only thing that could remain consistent betwixt the original Labyrinth movie and its proposed sequel is its main screenwriter, Terry Jones (of Monty Python fame and glory). But every bit of this moment, there's no word from the crumbling Brit as to his possible involvement in writing a sequel.
Every bit a result, there'south trivial hope that a Labyrinth 2 would exist anything more than a shameless, soulless cash catch aimed at adults who long for the simpler, stranger world that lay before them during the '80s. Any project based on profit, not passion, is doomed to fail, and that's why I'grand not looking forward to the mess of a sequel that undoubtedly lies ahead.
Source: https://www.ask.com/entertainment/labyrinth-sequel-bad-idea?utm_content=params%3Ao%3D740004%26ad%3DdirN%26qo%3DserpIndex
0 Response to "How Do You Know When the Master Cylinder Is Bad"
Post a Comment